Also needs
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.wicket</groupId>
<artifactId>wicket-cdi-1.1-weld</artifactId>
<version>0.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
John
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:59 PM, John Sarman <[email protected]> wrote:
> The 6.x branch needs the wicket-examples pom updated
>
> Add
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.jboss.weld.servlet</groupId>
> <artifactId>weld-servlet</artifactId>
> <version>2.1.0.Final</version>
> </dependency>
>
> Remove
> <dependency>
>
> <groupId>org.jboss.weld</groupId>
> <artifactId>weld-core</artifactId>
> <version>1.1.9.Final</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.jboss.weld.servlet</groupId>
> <artifactId>weld-servlet-core</artifactId>
> <version>1.1.9.Final</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.jboss.seam.conversation</groupId>
> <artifactId>seam-conversation-weld</artifactId>
> <version>3.0.0.Final</version>
> </dependency>
>
>
> Have not tested this.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The cdi examples were 'upgraded' to wicket-cdi-1.1 (you can check the
>> dependency on wicket-cdi-1.1-weld).
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Did I mention 1.1 ?:-)
>> > I say that the CDI example is broken. I think it uses 1.0
>> > On Nov 20, 2013 7:54 PM, "Emond Papegaaij" <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > wicket-cdi-1.1 is in a terrible state at the moment. Both in master
>> and
>> > > wicket-6.x. Perhaps we should remove or disable it for now in master
>> and
>> > > update it once I've done my work on 6.x.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> [email protected]
>> > > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > JS UI tests run only for master branch (v.7).
>> > > > There is no such problem in wicket-6.x. I guess something is not
>> merged
>> > > to
>> > > > master ...
>> > > > I'll check it tomorrow if someone else don't do it earlier.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
>> > > > [email protected]
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Martin,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Is this on wicket 6 or 7? I'm currently working on a side-branch
>> of
>> > the
>> > > > > wicket-6.x branch. This error is fixed in more recent versions of
>> > weld,
>> > > > so
>> > > > > it
>> > > > > seems this testcase is using an old version of weld. The next
>> version
>> > > of
>> > > > > weld not even logs a warning anymore, only a debug.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best regards,
>> > > > > Emond
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wednesday 20 November 2013 16:26:07 Martin Grigorov wrote:
>> > > > > > Hi Emond,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I guess your recent changes related to CDI broke the Wicket
>> > Examples
>> > > > > CDI
>> > > > > > example.
>> > > > > > The JavaScript UI tests fail with:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > org.jboss.weld.exceptions.DefinitionException: WELD-000070
>> Simple
>> > > > > bean
>> > > > > > [EnhancedAnnotatedTypeImpl] class
>> > > > > > org.apache.wicket.devutils.debugbar.DebugBar$3 cannot be a non-
>> > > > > static inner
>> > > > > > class
>> > > > > > at
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.BasicInjectionTarget.checkType(BasicInjec
>> > > > > t
>> > > > > > ionTarget.java:81) at
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.BasicInjectionTarget.<init>(BasicInjection
>> > > > > > Target.java:69) at
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.BeanInjectionTarget.<init>(BeanInjection
>> > > > > Ta
>> > > > > > rget.java:52) at
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.jboss.weld.manager.InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.createInjectionTarget(Inj
>> > > > > e
>> > > > > > ctionTargetFactoryImpl.java:95)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > This is related to the problem that led to Wicket 6.9.1 release.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Please fix it as you find appropriate.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
