ok, I'll take a look today
On 5 Jan 2016 12:27, "Martin Grigorov" <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote:

> This sounds as a regression caused by 950df6c24196680a48646ff92b3d95
> 9f4985a238
>
> @Andrea: could you please investigate and either improve further or revert
> the change? Thanks!
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Francois Meillet <
> francois.meil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > if the CachingStrategy is FilenameWithVersionResourceCachingStrategy
> > (default)
> >
> > BasicResourceReferenceMapper # mapHandler
> >         --> getCachingStrategy().decorateUrl(resourceUrl, cacheable);
> >                 --> FilenameWithVersionResourceCachingStrategy #
> > decorateUrl()
> >                         --> CachingResourceVersion # getVersion()
> >                                 --> resource.getCacheKey()
> >                                         --> ConcatBundleResource #
> > getCacheKey()
> >                                                 --> PackageResource #
> > getCacheKey() has been modified in the commit
> > 950df6c24196680a48646ff92b3d959f4985a238 "Improved
> > PackageResource#getCacheKey" done on the 3/1/2016
> >                                                         -->
> > PackageResource # exists()
> >
> > String absolutePath = Packages.absolutePath(scope, path) is wrong
> >
> > for the footer.css the absolutePath is
> >
> >
> org/apache/wicket/examples/resourcedecoration/org/apache/wicket/examples/resourcedecoration/footer.css
> >                                                 --> then
> > ConcatBundleResource # getCacheKey() return null
> >                                                         -->
> > ConcatBundleResource # reportError is called
> >
> > With the NoOpResourceCachingStrategy, decorateUrl does nothing, so there
> > is no problem.
> >
> > Francois
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Le 5 janv. 2016 à 09:58, martin-g <g...@git.apache.org> a écrit :
> >
> > > Github user martin-g commented on the pull request:
> > >
> > >    https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/154#issuecomment-168938119
> > >
> > >    It is interesting to find how this got broken.
> > >    Do you have time to `git bisect` it ?
> > >    I'll be able to do it as soon as next week.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
> > your
> > > reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
> > feature
> > > enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working,
> > please
> > > contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA
> > ticket
> > > with INFRA.
> > > ---
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to