Hi Pedro, On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Pedro Santos <pedros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Martin, > > Wicket-4201 IPageProvider improvement: will work on the ticket during the > week > > Expression language change [1]: it's a big change and I think it needs > the team approval > Here is the diff: https://github.com/apache/wicket/compare/WICKET-4008-property-expression-parser > > Wicket-4008 expression language parser: the parser is functional and > there isn't much work pending on it. I can finish and merge the work > during the week. > > 1 - http://wicket-dev.markmail.org/thread/unwdqpxulw7tcd5l The linked discussion makes me feel a bit uncertain. I want to avoid another "component queueing" case here, i.e. a rather bigger refactoring for something that only few people asked for and then leave the maintenance to someone else. The fact that you didn't have time to work on these changes in the last few months makes me think you may not have time to answer questions and fix bugs once it is released. No one can guarantee that (s)he will be around to help with his/her expertize, me included, but if you know from now that you won't have time then maybe it would be better to not make these changes. I agree that the team should decide so anyone is welcome to express his opinion! > > Pedro Santos > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > @Sven: have you started migrating your app ? > > > > @Pedro: any idea when you will have time to finish your improvements? Do > > you need any help ? > > > > > > > > Martin Grigorov > > Wicket Training and Consulting > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Probably we should stick to the principle: If it works, don't touch it! > >> This is related to CGLib and ClassMetaCache > >> > >> Martin Grigorov > >> Wicket Training and Consulting > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Pedro Santos <pedros...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> We can replace ClassMetaCache used in wicket-ioc's Injector by a > Jandex[1] > >>> class index. > >>> > >>> 1 - https://github.com/wildfly/jandex > >>> > >>> Pedro Santos > >>> > >>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org > > > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > The main advantages of ByteBuddy are: > >>> > - actively developed > >>> > - Mockito 2 moved to it > >>> > - Hibernate 5.x is moving to it ( > >>> > https://twitter.com/vlad_mihalcea/status/798971296910483456) > >>> > - Spring considers it (they actually already use it for the tests: > >>> > https://twitter.com/ankinson/status/799363435775586308) > >>> > - support for Java 9 (we will need it at some point) > >>> > - support for Android (I guess no one will ever run Wicket inside > >>> Android, > >>> > but who knows) > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Martin Grigorov > >>> > Wicket Training and Consulting > >>> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > >>> > > >>> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Replace CGLIB with ByteBuddy because it has better support for > Java 8 > >>> > and 9 > >>> > >> > >>> > > > >>> > > What are the advantages? Seems Spring hasn't decided on this yet: > >>> > > > >>> > > https://jira.spring.io/browse/SPR-8190 > >>> > > > >>> > > Regards > >>> > > Sven > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > On 20.11.2016 00:47, Martin Grigorov wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > >> Replace CGLIB with ByteBuddy because it has better support for > Java 8 > >>> > and > >>> > >> 9 > >>> > >> ? > >>> > >> CGLIB could stay as fallback (via system property) until 9.0.0. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Martin Grigorov > >>> > >> Wicket Training and Consulting > >>> > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > >>> > >> > >>> > >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Andrea Del Bene < > >>> an.delb...@gmail.com > >>> > > > >>> > >> wrote: > >>> > >> > >>> > >> yah, I think it's better > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 14/11/2016 19:54, Martin Grigorov wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> Maybe rename #forResource() to #of() ? > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> Martin Grigorov > >>> > >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting > >>> > >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Andrea Del Bene < > >>> > an.delb...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> I'm wondering if there is room for an improvement for > >>> > ResourceReference, > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>>> introducing lambda support also for this component. Actually > it's > >>> > >>>>> something > >>> > >>>>> that can be done after the release of 8.0.0, but I'd like to > >>> collect > >>> > >>>>> your > >>> > >>>>> feedback anyway. The idea is to provide factory methods to > build a > >>> > >>>>> ResourceReference using lambdas and avoiding anonymous classes > to > >>> > >>>>> implement > >>> > >>>>> getResource(). > >>> > >>>>> The following snippet should better explain what I mean: > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> https://gist.github.com/bitstorm/ > 03cfe9905a3f86a7160ab49f0ce23f13 > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> Andrea. > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> On 31/10/2016 14:41, Martin Grigorov wrote: > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> What other improvements do we need in 8.x/master before > >>> promoting it > >>> > >>>>>> to > >>> > >>>>>> 8.0.0 final ? > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> At https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Ideas+ > >>> > >>>>>> for+Wicket+8.0 > >>> > >>>>>> we still have: > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> - new DateTime APIs for wicket-datetime *WICKET-6105 > >>> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6105>* - I'll > give > >>> > this > >>> > >>>>>> one > >>> > >>>>>> more try but the problem is that I don't believe this is the > >>> proper > >>> > >>>>>> way > >>> > >>>>>> and > >>> > >>>>>> this demotivates me. > >>> > >>>>>> If someone else wants to give it a try - please assign it to > >>> > yourself! > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> - Better SEO for stateful pages - the only way I see this is > by > >>> > using > >>> > >>>>>> ServiceWorker to add the pageId as a request header to all > >>> requests > >>> > >>>>>> (normal > >>> > >>>>>> & Ajax) > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> Recently I wondered whether Redux.js could be in use for > Wicket. > >>> > >>>>>> I don't have much experience with it, but both React and > >>> AngularJs > >>> > >>>>>> communities use it to manage the state for their components. > >>> > >>>>>> There are some Java impls, even a standard is coming: > >>> > >>>>>> https://github.com/jvm-redux/jvm-redux-api > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> What else ? > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> Martin Grigorov > >>> > >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting > >>> > >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> >
