Hi,

I think that there is also a change need to be done before release - see: 
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/195#issuecomment-271501638

For Wicket 8 this would require a release for open-json. Wicket 6+7 can be 
changed by code

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 13.01.2017 um 00:08 schrieb Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> @Sven: have you started migrating your app ?
> 
> @Pedro: any idea when you will have time to finish your improvements? Do
> you need any help ?
> 
> 
> 
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Probably we should stick to the principle: If it works, don't touch it!
>> This is related to CGLib and ClassMetaCache
>> 
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> 
>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Pedro Santos <pedros...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We can replace ClassMetaCache used in wicket-ioc's Injector by a Jandex[1]
>>> class index.
>>> 
>>> 1 - https://github.com/wildfly/jandex
>>> 
>>> Pedro Santos
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The main advantages of ByteBuddy are:
>>>> - actively developed
>>>> - Mockito 2 moved to it
>>>> - Hibernate 5.x is moving to it (
>>>> https://twitter.com/vlad_mihalcea/status/798971296910483456)
>>>> - Spring considers it (they actually already use it for the tests:
>>>> https://twitter.com/ankinson/status/799363435775586308)
>>>> - support for Java 9 (we will need it at some point)
>>>> - support for Android (I guess no one will ever run Wicket inside
>>> Android,
>>>> but who knows)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Replace CGLIB with ByteBuddy because it has better support for Java 8
>>>> and 9
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> What are the advantages? Seems Spring hasn't decided on this yet:
>>>>> 
>>>>>        https://jira.spring.io/browse/SPR-8190
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Sven
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 20.11.2016 00:47, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Replace CGLIB with ByteBuddy because it has better support for Java 8
>>>> and
>>>>>> 9
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> CGLIB could stay as fallback (via system property) until 9.0.0.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Andrea Del Bene <
>>> an.delb...@gmail.com
>>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> yah, I think it's better
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 14/11/2016 19:54, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Maybe rename #forResource() to #of() ?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Andrea Del Bene <
>>>> an.delb...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm wondering if there is room for an improvement for
>>>> ResourceReference,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> introducing lambda support also for this component. Actually it's
>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>> that can be done after the release of 8.0.0, but I'd like to
>>> collect
>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>> feedback anyway. The idea is to provide factory methods to build a
>>>>>>>>> ResourceReference using lambdas and avoiding anonymous classes to
>>>>>>>>> implement
>>>>>>>>> getResource().
>>>>>>>>> The following snippet should better explain what I mean:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/bitstorm/03cfe9905a3f86a7160ab49f0ce23f13
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 31/10/2016 14:41, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> What other improvements do we need in 8.x/master before
>>> promoting it
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> 8.0.0 final ?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> At https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Ideas+
>>>>>>>>>> for+Wicket+8.0
>>>>>>>>>> we still have:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> - new DateTime APIs for wicket-datetime *WICKET-6105
>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6105>* - I'll give
>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>> more try but the problem is that I don't believe this is the
>>> proper
>>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> this demotivates me.
>>>>>>>>>> If someone else wants to give it a try - please assign it to
>>>> yourself!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> - Better SEO for stateful pages - the only way I see this is by
>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>> ServiceWorker to add the pageId as a request header to all
>>> requests
>>>>>>>>>> (normal
>>>>>>>>>> & Ajax)
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Recently I wondered whether Redux.js could be in use for Wicket.
>>>>>>>>>> I don't have much experience with it, but both React and
>>> AngularJs
>>>>>>>>>> communities use it to manage the state for their components.
>>>>>>>>>> There are some Java impls, even a standard is coming:
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/jvm-redux/jvm-redux-api
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> What else ?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to