I'm bisecting the code base. AFAIK It's something introduced after M5 On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Francois Meillet < francois.meil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, that was not the latest. > Forget my tcket. > > BTW I add that in the pom = <updatePolicy>always</updatePolicy> > > > François > > > > > Le 19 oct. 2017 à 15:58, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > > So it's not https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6481 .... > > > > WBR, Maxim > > (from mobile, sorry for the typos) > > > > On Oct 19, 2017 20:55, "Francois Meillet" <francois.meil...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> this is on the latest snapshot > >> > >> François > >> > >> > >> > >>> Le 19 oct. 2017 à 15:54, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> a > >> écrit : > >>> > >>> This issue might be already fixed, could you please check latest > >> snapshot? > >>> > >>> WBR, Maxim > >>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) > >>> > >>> On Oct 19, 2017 20:52, "Francois Meillet" <francois.meil...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> IllegalArgumentException: Argument 'pageClass' may not be null > >>>> > >>>> Dear Dev's > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Sorry for this one ! https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/WICKET-6485 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> use case : > >>>> > >>>> If I bookmark a stateful page, close the browser, reopen it and click > on > >>>> the bookmark > >>>> I get an IllegalArgumentException > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Argument 'pageClass' may not be > >> null. > >>>> at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.Args.notNull(Args.java:41) > >>>> at org.apache.wicket.core.request.mapper. > >> AbstractBookmarkableMapper$ > >>>> UrlInfo.<init>(AbstractBookmarkableMapper.java:90) > >>>> at org.apache.wicket.core.request.mapper. > >> AbstractBookmarkableMapper. > >>>> mapHandler(AbstractBookmarkableMapper.java:410) > >>>> at org.apache.wicket.request.mapper.CompoundRequestMapper. > >> mapHandler( > >>>> CompoundRequestMapper.java:210) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> François > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Le 19 oct. 2017 à 15:00, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> a > >> écrit > >>>> : > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Thomas Matthijs <li...@selckin.be> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Would it be possible to include https://github.com/apache/ > >>>> wicket/pull/237 > >>>>>> ? > >>>>>> That is the only major thing that failed when I upgraded from > wicket7 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The model setter was removed because it required a cast many years > >>>>>> ago, since the models have been reworked so a cast is no longer > >>>>>> needed. The ListView itself still support modifying it in multiple > >>>>>> ways with the moveUp/Down links, therefor I don't see any objections > >>>>>> to adding the setter again > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Looks ok to me > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Andrea Del Bene < > >> an.delb...@gmail.com > >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Martijn Dashorst < > >>>>>>> martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I say make a final milestone. Work on a press release for Wicket 8 > >>>>>> final, > >>>>>>>> work with Sally from PR to get the press release in good shape, > cut > >>>> 8.0 > >>>>>> and > >>>>>>>> release it upon the world. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Martijn > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Absolutely! M8 is meant to be the last milestone before GA. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Andrea Del Bene < > >>>> an.delb...@gmail.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> i dare ask you... :-) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: > >>>> http://wicketinaction.com > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
