On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello All, > > Recently I found an article about Wicket in Russian: > https://habrahabr.ru/company/jugru/blog/345036/ > > I'm afraid the article is negative :( > > The main points are: > 1) there is lack of developer activity > 2) Wicket based applications consumes lots of memory > 3) The performance is bad > 4) there is no scalability (no cluster support) > Like many other Java web frameworks scalability can be implemented using distributed data store (like Ignite or Hazelcast) for web session. I can't read Russian so I don't know which frameworks have been compared to Wicket but I also agree that these conclusions are (to say the least) unfounded. > > surprisingly #3 is illustrated by the speed of wicket.apache.org > > IMO this article lacks numbers and "evidences" > > I can try to > 1) write an article with some numbers to refute this > I now it takes a lot of time writing technical articles but it would be great! > 2) visit https://2018.jbreak.ru/en/ > ...to face the author of the article :-)??? > .... > > WDYT? > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax >
