Actually article authors welcoming wicket fans to visit jbreak and argue with them I guess it also might be sort of advertising ....
You can use google translate to get the idea ... On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > Recently I found an article about Wicket in Russian: > > https://habrahabr.ru/company/jugru/blog/345036/ > > > > I'm afraid the article is negative :( > > > > The main points are: > > 1) there is lack of developer activity > > 2) Wicket based applications consumes lots of memory > > 3) The performance is bad > > 4) there is no scalability (no cluster support) > > > > Like many other Java web frameworks scalability can be implemented > using distributed > data store (like Ignite or Hazelcast) for web session. > > I can't read Russian so I don't know which frameworks have been compared to > Wicket but I also agree that these conclusions are (to say the least) > unfounded. > > > > > > surprisingly #3 is illustrated by the speed of wicket.apache.org > > > > IMO this article lacks numbers and "evidences" > > > > I can try to > > 1) write an article with some numbers to refute this > > > > I now it takes a lot of time writing technical articles but it would be > great! > > > > 2) visit https://2018.jbreak.ru/en/ > > > > ...to face the author of the article :-)??? > > > > .... > > > > WDYT? > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
