I agree with Korbinian: IMHO we should drop that feature.
Sven
Am 28.03.2018 um 18:35 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
I also noticed all libraries are old :(
Not sure "Drop this feature" is great idea
Some users (including me) might find it useful :))
BTW why do we have both?
isBrowserMozilla())
isBrowserMozillaFirefox()
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:19 PM, Korbinian Bachl
<korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote:
IMHO: its 2018 and any browser sniffing has to be dropped at all, as it has no
use anyway and its not working reliable... what for do we need this at all?
even in 2009 it was considered bad:
https://www.sitepoint.com/why-browser-sniffing-stinks/
and in case that is not enough, read what the guy that invented modernizr has
to say:
http://farukat.es/journal/2011/02/499-lest-we-forget-or-how-i-learned-whats-so-bad-about-browser-sniffing/
btw:
https://github.com/HaraldWalker/user-agent-utils -> this is EOL, guess why...
https://github.com/pieroxy/java-user-agent-detection/releases -> last release
from september 2017...
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com>
An: dev@wicket.apache.org
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. März 2018 18:04:03
Betreff: [DISCUSSION] WICKET-6544 mobile browser detection
Hello All,
While reviewing WICKET-6544 Martin propose to use JS library for this task
Here are some examples:
https://github.com/pieroxy/java-user-agent-detection or
https://github.com/HaraldWalker/user-agent-utils
WDYT
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
