Sounds interesting. For the moment, I am using the WicketStuff URLFragment. It is a bit quirky though. One of the problems with URLFragments is that they may have to change while on the same page, e.g. to track some page state such as a position within a document or such. With URL fragments, the distinction between a page and a "single page application" starts to get quite blurry... likewise, the handling of history when the fragment is involved.
-- Richard > On 28. Dec 2024, at 17:28, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > lately I had to append a URI fragment to a mounted page. The operation wasn't > so trivial as I expected and I ended up with a workaround involving a custom > page mounter that adds the fragment to the generated URL (inside method > buildUrl). I know this might be an uncommon use case, but wouldn't be nice > if we introduce URI fragment support with PageParameters (i.e adding a > /fragment/ field)? Let me know what do you think about this idea. > > Andrea.