On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 at 00:41, Richard Eckart de Castilho <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > Sounds interesting. > > For the moment, I am using the WicketStuff URLFragment.
we are also using this one :) works as expected due to we are not using '<a name="" ... ' :) > It is a bit quirky though. > One of the problems with URLFragments is that they may have to change while > on the > same page, e.g. to track some page state such as a position within a document > or > such. With URL fragments, the distinction between a page and a "single page > application" > starts to get quite blurry... likewise, the handling of history when the > fragment is involved. > > -- Richard > > > On 28. Dec 2024, at 17:28, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > lately I had to append a URI fragment to a mounted page. The operation > > wasn't so trivial as I expected and I ended up with a workaround involving > > a custom page mounter that adds the fragment to the generated URL (inside > > method buildUrl). I know this might be an uncommon use case, but wouldn't > > be nice if we introduce URI fragment support with PageParameters (i.e > > adding a /fragment/ field)? Let me know what do you think about this idea. > > > > Andrea. > -- Best regards, Maxim
