Hello All, Is there any way to tell `japicmp-maven-plugin` com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper -> tools.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper change is OK? :) Or Jackson update should remain in 11.x only? :)
On Wed, 2 Sept 2026 at 18:30, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello All, > > from mobile (sorry for typos ;) > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2026, 13:26 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have prepared https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/1564 :) >> >> Please let me know if similar changes (in EE10 mode) would be OK for >> wicket-10.x :) > > > Can someone review this PR please? :) > >> >> On Wed, 2 Sept 2026 at 13:05, Pedro Santos <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Maxim, >> > >> > > wicket-10 has CDI 3.0 and weld 4.0 is it on purpose? :) >> > >> > I think it's a less used module that missed the version bump in the branch, >> > not on purpose. >> > >> > > but CDI/Weld is 4.1/6.0 which is EE11 :) >> > >> > Here I assumed that we would rather have the last version in master. >> > >> > Pedro Santos >> > >> > >> > Em qua., 2 de set. de 2026 às 02:50, Maxim Solodovnik >> > <[email protected]> >> > escreveu: >> > >> > > Similar question regarding wicket-11 >> > > >> > > servlet spec is 6.0.0 which is EE10 >> > > but CDI/Weld is 4.1/6.0 which is EE11 :) >> > > >> > > On Wed, 2 Sept 2026 at 12:23, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Hello All, >> > > > >> > > > Due to Wicket 10 is based at servlets 6.0 I'm assuming it should be >> > > > EE10 compatible >> > > > BUT according to https://jakarta.ee/release/10/ EE10 must have CDI 4.0 >> > > > >> > > > wicket-10 has CDI 3.0 and weld 4.0 is it on purpose? :) >> > > > >> > > > The question arise due to I have updated `wicketstuff-10` to jetty >> > > > 12.1 >> > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/commit/e29e13abced816beaed2cc76cdb7d5d2e64db8dc >> > > > >> > > > And observing Weld/CDI issues while trying to prepare similar PR for >> > > wicket >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Best regards, >> > > > Maxim >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Best regards, >> > > Maxim >> > > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Maxim -- Best regards, Maxim
