Really. :)

That is my understanding as well.  In practice, the copyright doesn't much
*matter* because the ASL allows for unencumbered copying/modification/usage,
but it is retained by the authors.

http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html

--Glen

On 11/29/2010 12:17 PM, Tom Jordahl wrote:
> So if this is true, Macromedia (my and Glen Daniels employer at the time) and 
> now Adobe owns a copyright on Apache Axis code?  We just didn't ask the 
> team to put this copyright in the code/NOTICE file?
> 
> And Day (now Adobe) has copyrights on the JackRabbit code?
> 
> And Sun (now Oracle) has copyrights on the tomcat code?
> 
> But the license is all ASF....
> 
> Really?  
> 
> Tom Jordahl
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 12:09 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Tom Jordahl; Benson Margulies
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release WSS4J 1.5.10
> 
> On Monday 29 November 2010 12:01:00 pm Tom Jordahl wrote:
>> Arg!
>>
>> In order to submit a patch, isn't it a requirement that all rights of the
>> patch be transferred over to the ASF?
> 
> No.   In fact, in almost no cases does code contributed to the ASF include 
> the 
> copyright.    When I make a commit to any code at the ASF, I (or my employer 
> if I'm doing it as a work for hire) maintain the copyright on the code.   
> HOWEVER, as part of my ICLA and my companies CCLA, the ASF is granted a 
> license to use the code.      
> 
>> I think we need to consult legal on this, because if the Innovation Center
>> owns a copyright and/or license to the WSS4J code, that is not so good.
> 
> This is  no different.   They maintain the copyright.   However, when they 
> submitted it to the JIRA, they clicked on the tick box that says they "Grant 
> license to ASF for inclusion in ASF works (as per the Apache License ยง5)".   
> This is no different than the above.  
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
>> I would be -1 for accepting a patch that comes with copyrights.
>>
>> Tom Jordahl
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 10:51 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: Benson Margulies
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release WSS4J 1.5.10
>>
>> On Monday 29 November 2010 10:44:37 am Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> Do we really have to credit patches?
>>
>> If they request it, yes.   They hold the copyright on the material in that
>> patch and, while they license it to us under the  Apache License, the
>> Apache License specifically states we need to keep notices intact that the
>> copyright holders request/require.
>>
>> In this case, the submitter has asked that the copyright notice be in the
>> NOTICE.     Thus, we need to keep it there.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Tom Jordahl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Conditional +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that the NOTICE file has the following:
>>>>
>>>> "This product includes software Copyright University of Southampton IT
>>>> Innovation Centre, 2006 (http://www.it-innovation.soton.ac.uk)."
>>>>
>>>> I couldn't figure out what software this was - if I am using
>>>> wss4j-1.5.10.jar, do I have to worry about this?  This should be
>>>> removed or we should be clearer about what this means (i.e. what part
>>>> do I need to exclude if I ship a product with wss4j in it).
>>>>
>>>> Also, the date in the NOTICE file is 2009, probably should be 2010.
>>>>
>>>> I only examined the binary zip, did not try to build the source.
>>>>
>>>> Tom Jordahl
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 12:17 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release WSS4J 1.5.10
>>>>
>>>> To the Apache Web Services Community,
>>>>
>>>> This is a call for votes for the wss4j-1.5.10 release. This release
>>>> contains an upgrade to use XML Security 1.4.4, some important fixes
>>>> for supporting chained certificates and processing SAML assertions, as
>>>> well as a couple of other issues.
>>>>
>>>> The distribution was built from the following SVN tag;
>>>>
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/webservices/wss4j/tags/1_5_10/
>>>>
>>>> The distribution can be found at the following URL:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~coheigea/stage/wss4j/1.5.10/dist/
>>>>
>>>> You can also point maven at the following URL to pull down the 1.5.10
>>>> release POM, source, and class JARs:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~coheigea/stage/wss4j/1.5.10/maven/
>>>>
>>>> This vote will stay open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1 (binding).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Colm.
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to