We don't have one now. At the same time, we *also* don't have a convenient, general, is-a method.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Glen Daniels <[email protected]> wrote: > So the use-case here is that we might be using XmlSchema to do, say, data > binding, and want to check something like - a given element IS_A xsd:string, > when in fact it's a derived simple type like xsd:token? > > That sounds potentially useful if we don't have a tidy way to do that > already. > > --Glen > > On 4/20/11 4:20 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLSCHEMA-12 >> >> Proposes that we model the basic type hierarchy of the built-in types. >> >> My first reaction was negative, but the idea is growing on me. After >> all, you can't usefully serialize the built-in schema to xml, so what >> harm could be done here? >> >> Has anyone else got an idea? >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
