On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Andreas Veithen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be >>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I >>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from Forrest >>> to Maven. >> >> >> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had to on >> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again >> middle of this week . >> >> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be better >> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings is the >> best choice at this time. >> >> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code with JDK >> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether this >> could be the very last Woden release. >> >> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this approach >> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release. >> >> I would like see others thoughts. > > I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and > I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular > if we try simplifying the release process. > >> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation from >> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find enough >> time. > > I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The > generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost > if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of > them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation > as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest > thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could > review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the > sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to > make this project releasable using a straightforward release process > such as the one I use for Axiom.
That statement was probably too optimistic. There is some more work required. I think we also have another problem, namely that the report produced by the W3C test suite suggests that there are regressions. >> Thanks ! >>> >>> >>> Andreas >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hello, >>> > >>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like: >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234 >>> > >>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled. >>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with >>> > already >>> > incorporated fixes? >>> > >>> > Kind regards, >>> > >>> > Dmitry >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sagara Gunathunga >> >> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com >> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/ >> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
