Confirmed. There are indeed regressions: http://ws.apache.org/woden-staging/w3c-tests/results/Interchange.html
Three of the test failures didn't occur with 1.0M9. Andreas On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Andreas Veithen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Andreas Veithen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be >>>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I >>>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from Forrest >>>> to Maven. >>> >>> >>> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had to on >>> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again >>> middle of this week . >>> >>> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be better >>> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings is the >>> best choice at this time. >>> >>> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code with JDK >>> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether this >>> could be the very last Woden release. >>> >>> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this approach >>> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release. >>> >>> I would like see others thoughts. >> >> I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and >> I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular >> if we try simplifying the release process. >> >>> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation from >>> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find enough >>> time. >> >> I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The >> generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost >> if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of >> them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation >> as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest >> thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could >> review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the >> sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to >> make this project releasable using a straightforward release process >> such as the one I use for Axiom. > > That statement was probably too optimistic. There is some more work > required. I think we also have another problem, namely that the report > produced by the W3C test suite suggests that there are regressions. > >>> Thanks ! >>>> >>>> >>>> Andreas >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > Hello, >>>> > >>>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like: >>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234 >>>> > >>>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled. >>>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with >>>> > already >>>> > incorporated fixes? >>>> > >>>> > Kind regards, >>>> > >>>> > Dmitry >>>> > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sagara Gunathunga >>> >>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com >>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/ >>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
