Hi The test has been done with New Logging Vs without New logging. Please ignore sys-log which is mentioned in the above mail.
Thanks, Reka On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi all, > > The following are the results which i have got when doing performance test > with new logging vs sys-log. Each request got printed with 100 logs. So the > logs count is all together RequestsCount * 100. I couldn't make it to test > with much high load since i did the testing on my local machine. I have > done this testing for ST at the moment. > > New Logging > ========== > > Requests Count Throughput(/sec)-Sys-log Latency(time taken > to writte logs in BAM after sys-log written down) > > 500 40.2 67s > 1000 34.8 147s > 2000 32.1 287s > > Sys-Log only > ========= > > 500 47.6 > 1000 46.4 > 2000 44.4 > > I have attached here with the profile and memory usage of sys-log and new > logging framework. > > FYI: > For sys-Log, i haven't noticed much different in memory usage and profile > different while concurrent request count varies. But with New logging > memory usage seems to be getting bit high with request count increases. The > profiles for new logging with all three request attached here with. > > I'll update the thread while i'm doing the test for tenant as well as for > high loads. Also, please suggest if i need to include any other steps.. > > Thanks, > Reka >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
