Sure..Will confirm with BAM on the count. On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Srinath Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
> BAM guys get about 30000 events/ sec on their new tests. Please talk to > them and compare > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I'll talk with BAM team in order to make it more accuracy. >> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> What I was expecting was a test where you send a service request, and >>>> the service sends back an echo or something, take note of the latency, then >>>> make that same log a request with that new appender enabled, and record the >>>> latency and compare. This has to be done for about 50k messages for each >>>> round. >>> >>> >> Sure. I will include this into the testing. >> >> Thanks, >> Reka >> >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> The following are the results which i have got when doing performance >>>> test with new logging vs sys-log. Each request got printed with 100 logs. >>>> So the logs count is all together RequestsCount * 100. I couldn't make it >>>> to test with much high load since i did the testing on my local machine. I >>>> have done this testing for ST at the moment. >>>> >>>> New Logging >>>> ========== >>>> >>>> Requests Count Throughput(/sec)-Sys-log Latency(time >>>> taken to writte logs in BAM after sys-log written down) >>>> >>>> 500 40.2 >>>> 67s >>>> 1000 34.8 >>>> 147s >>>> 2000 32.1 >>>> 287s >>>> >>>> Sys-Log only >>>> ========= >>>> >>>> 500 47.6 >>>> 1000 46.4 >>>> 2000 44.4 >>>> >>>> I have attached here with the profile and memory usage of sys-log and >>>> new logging framework. >>>> >>>> FYI: >>>> For sys-Log, i haven't noticed much different in memory usage and >>>> profile different while concurrent request count varies. But with New >>>> logging memory usage seems to be getting bit high with request count >>>> increases. The profiles for new logging with all three request attached >>>> here with. >>>> >>>> I'll update the thread while i'm doing the test for tenant as well as >>>> for high loads. Also, please suggest if i need to include any other steps.. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Reka >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Afkham Azeez* >>> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com >>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ >>> * <http://www.apache.org/>** >>> email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 77 3320919 >>> blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>* >>> twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> >>> * >>> linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez* >>> * >>> * >>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware* >>> >>> >> > > > -- > ============================ > Srinath Perera, Ph.D. > Senior Software Architect, WSO2 Inc. > Visiting Faculty, University of Moratuwa > Member, Apache Software Foundation > Research Scientist, Lanka Software Foundation > Blog: http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/ > Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hemapani/ > Phone: 0772360902 >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
