Hi Isuru/Akila, On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <[email protected]> wrote:
To summarize: - Publish a wso2 product specific docker image to a local docker repository (we can even push to dockerhub, without the JDK distribution and ask the users to provide the JDK when spinning up a container from the image). A good suggestion, since we currently track product downloads for analytics we might need to find a way to do the same with Docker if we were to publicly share WSO2 Docker images. Otherwise using a local registry with a base/product image would do. - Guide the users/developers to create their own Dockerfile extending from the original wso2 product Docker image. We might need to solve 1, to do this. On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Akila Ravihansa Perera < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I'm not against having a base image for the WSO2 Docker images. But, IMHO > the advantages should be significant for doing so. AFAIU there is no > significant advantage of doing so currently. But, this is my take only. > Therefore lets get the input from the community on this matter. > > @Imesh: WDYT? > > Currently almost all of us use a base image locally to reduce the internet bandwidth usage due to executing docker builds from scratch. Therefore I think it would be better to push that to the remote repository. As Akila has mentioned the only downside of this is the image size being increased by around 100 MB. When creating Docker images for production deployment those optimizations can be taken into account. Thanks > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > > Isuru H. > +94 716 358 048* <http://wso2.com/>* > > > -- *Imesh Gunaratne* Software Architect WSO2 Inc: http://wso2.com T: +94 11 214 5345 M: +94 77 374 2057 W: https://medium.com/@imesh TW: @imesh Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
