Hi Sathya, On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Sathya Bandara <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Johann, > > IMO having two separate LDAP attributes for the same claims in both SCIM1 > and SCIM2 would be redundant and cause problems in maintaining user > attributes. > True. I didn't say this is the correct solution. I only mentioned it as a work around for someone who wants to use both without any conflicts until we find a alternative or deprecate SCIM 1.1 :) > If we need to have both listeners enabled at the time I would suggest to > use a common util method to generate IDs and do the mappings for the claims > that are common to both protocols. > Didn't get how this would help exactly. May be I am missing some context. However, after reading through your first reply again, now I have another question. Why do both the listeners get executed when adding a new user? I know they both will get triggered. But can't we look at the dialect URI at the top and skip the execution if it's not for that listener? Regards, Johann. > > Thanks, > Sathya > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Johann Nallathamby <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Will it work if we have two separate attributes for the problematic >> attributes like SCIM ID? If that works I guess that is one solution. >> >> Or we need to have one listener for both SCIM 1 and SCIM2. But don't >> think that's a good solution. Introduces direct coupling between two >> implementations. >> >> Regards, >> Johann. >> >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Sathya Bandara <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Thilina, >>> >>> If we enable both SCIM1 and SCIM2 listeners at the same time two >>> different SCIM IDs will be generated for the same user when adding a new >>> user through SCIM. Also both SCIM1 and SCIM2 claims are mapped to the same >>> LDAP user attributes. Even though both listeners get triggered only the >>> SCIM1 ID is mapped to the user ID attribute. But the SCIM2 user creation >>> response will contain the SCIM ID generated by SCIM2 listener. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sathya >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Thilina Madumal <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> While I was trying to fix IDENTITY-6315 >>>> <https://wso2.org/jira/browse/IDENTITY-6315> I got to know that we >>>> can't enable both SCIM1 and SCIM2 at the same time in WSO2 Identity Server. >>>> Is it because of this specific issue or is there any other reasons? >>>> >>>> Thanks & Regards, >>>> Thilina. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Thilina Madumal* >>>> *Software Engineer | **WSO2* >>>> Email: [email protected] >>>> Mobile: *+ <+94%2077%20767%201807>94 774553167* >>>> Web: <http://goog_716986954>http://wso2.com >>>> >>>> <http://wso2.com/signature> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sathya Bandara >>> Software Engineer >>> WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com >>> Mobile: (+94) 715 360 421 <+94%2071%20411%205032> >>> >>> <+94%2071%20411%205032> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks & Regards, >> >> *Johann Dilantha Nallathamby* >> Senior Lead Solutions Engineer >> WSO2, Inc. >> lean.enterprise.middleware >> >> Mobile - *+94777776950* >> Blog - *http://nallaa.wordpress.com <http://nallaa.wordpress.com>* >> > > > > -- > Sathya Bandara > Software Engineer > WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com > Mobile: (+94) 715 360 421 <+94%2071%20411%205032> > > <+94%2071%20411%205032> > -- Thanks & Regards, *Johann Dilantha Nallathamby* Senior Lead Solutions Engineer WSO2, Inc. lean.enterprise.middleware Mobile - *+94777776950* Blog - *http://nallaa.wordpress.com <http://nallaa.wordpress.com>*
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
