Samuel, I see two immediate needs for Xalan-J:
1) Version 2.7.2 seems to have broken some 2.7.1 clients. That needs to be addressed in a possible 2.7.3 release. See the ML and JIRA for recent issues. 2) The trunk code is in an unknown state as far as I can tell. There does not seem to be anyone around the ML to answer questions. Please dig through the ML archives for my posts about build issues. In theory a new 2.8 should come out of trunk, but I do not know what is in there compared to the 2.7.x branch. Once we know what we have, then we can decide how to proceed. One option would be to fold 2.7.2 back into trunk and go from there. Any and all help is appreciated! Gary On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Samuel Queiroz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > What do you think is the greatest need of Xalan currently? Is it 1) XPath > and XSLT 2 support or 2) bug fixes and tests or 3) other? What about having > a roadmap? > > How could we get more people motivated to work on Xalan? I think we could > have (on Xalan website) a 'success stories' section and a list of > enterprises/organizations/projects that use and like our project. > > What do you think about having an IRC channel to discuss things more > quickly and actively? > > Thanks, > Samuel > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
