There are plenty of tests:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Samuel Queiroz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi devs, > > To solve and to avoid the incompatibility between versions, I think we > need to create tests for Xalan. I looked for tests and I couldn't find > anything. > > Initially, we could use JUnit to create integration tests. > I am planning to add these tests on the trunk using git. > > Just to make sure: Can I use git to contribute? > > -- > > In addition, once we have tests, I think we could make use of a conitnuous > integration environment. > > What is the conitnuous integration tool used on Apache? > > -- > > A Xalan-J 2.8 version could be composed by: > - Bug fixes for what become bronken with the 2.7.2 release; > - Tests for the existing behavior. > > Thanks, > Samuel > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Samuel, >> >> I see two immediate needs for Xalan-J: >> >> 1) Version 2.7.2 seems to have broken some 2.7.1 clients. That needs to >> be addressed in a possible 2.7.3 release. See the ML and JIRA for recent >> issues. >> >> 2) The trunk code is in an unknown state as far as I can tell. There does >> not seem to be anyone around the ML to answer questions. Please dig through >> the ML archives for my posts about build issues. In theory a new 2.8 should >> come out of trunk, but I do not know what is in there compared to the 2.7.x >> branch. >> >> Once we know what we have, then we can decide how to proceed. One option >> would be to fold 2.7.2 back into trunk and go from there. >> >> Any and all help is appreciated! >> >> Gary >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Samuel Queiroz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> What do you think is the greatest need of Xalan currently? Is it 1) >>> XPath and XSLT 2 support or 2) bug fixes and tests or 3) other? What about >>> having a roadmap? >>> >>> How could we get more people motivated to work on Xalan? I think we >>> could have (on Xalan website) a 'success stories' section and a list of >>> enterprises/organizations/projects that use and like our project. >>> >>> What do you think about having an IRC channel to discuss things more >>> quickly and actively? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Samuel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
