On 29/03/2023 11:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
Ah! Please accept my apologies!

👍

So, with last email from Mukul, just need to have the [RESULT] vote mail from Mukul to officially have the new xalan release!

Thanks for the contributors (Joseph, Mukul, etc.)

Milamber


Gary

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:52 Milamber <milam...@apache.org <mailto:milam...@apache.org>> wrote:

    Hi,

    On vote call, Mukul have add this line at the end of mail:

    Great work everyone. Here's my +1 for this RC.

    So two +1 for this vote (you and Mukul)

    Milamber

    On 29/03/2023 10:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
    I count one +1 vote (from me). Mukul still has to officially
    reply with a +1 if he so desires to vote even though he called
    the vote.

    Gary

    On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:33 Milamber <milam...@apache.org
    <mailto:milam...@apache.org>> wrote:

        Hi,

        I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes because no
        veto (-1
        vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy consensus way?

        https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

        "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of
        majority rule
        unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more
        favourable votes
        than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have
        passed --
        regardless of the number of votes in each category. (If the
        number of
        votes seems too small to be representative of a community
        consensus, the
        issue is typically not pursued. However, see the description
        of lazy
        consensus for a modifying factor.)"


        Milamber

        On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
        > Hi all,
        >      We need more Xalan pmc reviews, to have this RC
        declared to be approved.
        >
        > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22 PM Gary Gregory
        <garydgreg...@gmail.com <mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
        >> Thank you Mukul for this RC.
        >>
        >> +1
        >>
        >> - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK.
        >> - Building runtime with 'chmod +x ./build.sh && ./build.sh
        clean fulldist' OK.
        >> - Following the README, there is confusion because the
        unzipped src zip creates a `xalan-test` folder as a child
        folder but the README describes it as a sibling folder. Does
        this skew the tests or cause issues?
        >> - TODOs later:
        >> -- Fix Javadoc errors
        >> -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug mode: No
        need to tell me all the test files that PASS, I have no idea
        if I am missing any failure output without tediously
        reviewing ALL console output.
        >>
        >> Using:
        >>
        >> ant -version
        >> Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on January 4 2023
        >>
        >> java -version
        >> openjdk version "1.8.0_362"
        >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build
        1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-b00)
        >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00, mixed mode)
        >>
        >> uname -a
        >> Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.3.0: Mon Jan 30
        20:42:11 PST 2023; root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
        >>
        >> Gary
        >



Reply via email to