On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 8:04 AM Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On 29/03/2023 11:49, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Ah! Please accept my apologies! > > > 👍 > > So, with last email from Mukul, just need to have the [RESULT] vote mail > from Mukul to officially have the new xalan release! > Where is the 3rd binding vote? I might have missed it. The result email will list all votes. Gary > > Thanks for the contributors (Joseph, Mukul, etc.) > > Milamber > > > Gary > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:52 Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On vote call, Mukul have add this line at the end of mail: >> >> Great work everyone. Here's my +1 for this RC. >> >> >> So two +1 for this vote (you and Mukul) >> >> Milamber >> >> On 29/03/2023 10:37, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> I count one +1 vote (from me). Mukul still has to officially reply with a >> +1 if he so desires to vote even though he called the vote. >> >> Gary >> >> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:33 Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes because no veto (-1 >>> vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy consensus way? >>> >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>> >>> "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule >>> unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes >>> than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- >>> regardless of the number of votes in each category. (If the number of >>> votes seems too small to be representative of a community consensus, the >>> issue is typically not pursued. However, see the description of lazy >>> consensus for a modifying factor.)" >>> >>> >>> Milamber >>> >>> On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote: >>> > Hi all, >>> > We need more Xalan pmc reviews, to have this RC declared to be >>> approved. >>> > >>> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> Thank you Mukul for this RC. >>> >> >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK. >>> >> - Building runtime with 'chmod +x ./build.sh && ./build.sh clean >>> fulldist' OK. >>> >> - Following the README, there is confusion because the unzipped src >>> zip creates a `xalan-test` folder as a child folder but the README >>> describes it as a sibling folder. Does this skew the tests or cause issues? >>> >> - TODOs later: >>> >> -- Fix Javadoc errors >>> >> -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug mode: No need to tell >>> me all the test files that PASS, I have no idea if I am missing any failure >>> output without tediously reviewing ALL console output. >>> >> >>> >> Using: >>> >> >>> >> ant -version >>> >> Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on January 4 2023 >>> >> >>> >> java -version >>> >> openjdk version "1.8.0_362" >>> >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-b00) >>> >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00, mixed mode) >>> >> >>> >> uname -a >>> >> Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.3.0: Mon Jan 30 20:42:11 >>> PST 2023; root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 >>> >> >>> >> Gary >>> > >>> >>> >> >
