Hi Joseph,

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:58 PM Joseph Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> I'd like to take a  better look at what we've got before opining on that.

That's fine. Please take your time to work on XalanJ issues, that
you're interested to work on.

> I presume you've been committing conformance tests for the new functions 
> along with their implementations?

I'm writing below, about the XalanJ implementation that we've added to
dev repos branch xalan-j_xslt3.0.

The JUnit java class
https://github.com/apache/xalan-java/blob/xalan-j_xslt3.0/tests/org/apache/xalan/xslt3/AllXsl3Tests.java,
is an entry point to invoke the whole of XSLT 3.0 + XPath 3.1 combined
tests that we've written so far. [1]

The folder 
https://github.com/apache/xalan-java/tree/xalan-j_xslt3.0/tests/org/apache/xalan/xpath3,
has all the XPath 3.1 related tests that we've written so far (which
contains, tests for XPath 3.1 functions, operators, and expressions).
[2]

And folder, 
https://github.com/apache/xalan-java/tree/xalan-j_xslt3.0/tests/org/apache/xalan/xslt3,
has all the tests for XSLT 3.0 related implementation that we've added
to XalanJ. [3]

The JUnit test suite at [1] is a sum of tests at location [2] and [3].


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@xalan.apache.org

Reply via email to