I'm not convinced that retrofitting 4.0 features into an essentially 2.0 
processor is the best way to progress toward 4.0. I'd need to look at the spec 
to see whether, as in 3.0, some basic changes to the data model and processing 
were introduced. As your experience playing with a 3.0 subset has shown, that 
isn't always simple, or even possible, without breaking 2.0 semantics.

Would working from the Xalan codebase, with its legacy warts, really be easier 
than building a new processor based on what we learned in Xalan? I don't 
currently have a strong opinion.

Do we really have the resources to tackle this? If we still had the kind of 
man-hours that built Xalan originally I'd say it was worth trying to lead the 
pack again, but...


--
   /_  Joe Kesselman (he/him/his)
-/ _) My Alexa skill for New Music/New Sounds fans:
   /   https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09WJ3H657/

Caveat: Opinionated old geezer with overcompensated writer's block. May be 
redundant, verbose, prolix, sesquipedalian, didactic, officious, or redundant.
________________________________
From: Mukul Gandhi <muk...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2024 12:58:14 PM
To: dev@xalan.apache.org <dev@xalan.apache.org>
Subject: xsl 4.0 draft specs, and xalan implementation

Hi all,
   As we know, we've done little implementation work within XalanJ's
xslt 3.0 dev branch.

These days, there's an XSL 4.0 specs development work going on, within
QT4 community group (ref, https://qt4cg.org/).

These days, within the XSL 4.0 set of QT4 specs, specs related to XSLT
4.0 and related languages are getting specified. At the bottom of page
https://qt4cg.org/, links to latest drafts of XSLT 4.0 and related
specs are available.

Can we, create an codebase dev branch on XalanJ dev repos for XSLT 4.0
implementation work, and try to implement few useful features from
latest drafts of the XSLT 4.0 and related specs?

Any thoughts please?


--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@xalan.apache.org

Reply via email to