Hi Joseph, On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 9:19 PM Joseph Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > Mukul: I haven't looked at the 3.0 prototypes in any detail yet. Would it be > possible to restructure them as an extension set? Would you be willing to do > so? If you want to make these available for folks to start playing with, I > think that would be the best path forward for them, and for early 4.0 > experimentation too.
Yes sure please, and I think that's a nice idea. I'd prefer to create 'new XalanJ dev repos branch [1]' from an existing XalanJ dev repos branch that's currently there (I think, we should retain that work within its existing dev repos branch, as its currently there, since that code implementation has been written to progress it to a complete XSLT 3.0 processor) for XSL 3.0 work. When this new XalanJ dev repos branch ([1]) gets created, we (myself to start with perhaps, as you're querying whether I'm willing to do so) can move all new XPath 3.x functions that we've implemented to a new XalanJ XML extensions functions namespace. I also think that, we should stop immediately further dev work on current XalanJ dev repos branch for 3.0 spec implementation, and instead start the XPath 3.x functions refactoring to the new XML extensions namespace as you've suggested which I think is ok as well. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@xalan.apache.org
