Hi Joseph,
You wrote,
<quote>
Question: has the 3.0 branch been moved to a Maven build yet? I can't speak
for anyone else, but I would find it somewhat disconcerting if the two code
streams were using different build engines.
This is presuming that we do indeed have consensus that we are moving to
Maven.
</quote>
And my following thoughts,
I'd personally like to put more effort in coming weeks & months to fix few
more codebase bugs present in Xalan-J's XSL 3 branch, perhaps implement 1-2
more XSLT 3 instructions, and improve further Xalan-J's XSL 3 tests
coverage. All of the previous activities I wish to do on Xalan-J's XSL 3
branch using existing Ant build to help us still focused on XSL 3 languages
instead on migrating to a different build process.
Support of more contributors to Xalan-J's XSL 3 codebase shall definitely
be helpful, to be able to improve Xalan-J's compliance to XSL 3 specs
further.
Surely, we can try to migrate to Maven before releasing to users the 1st
XSL 3 build from Xalan project.
Regards,
Mukul
Mail sent from gmail for Android
