TY all for your feedback, I've amended the report with "We plan on completing
porting the build from Ant to Maven, fixing bugs, and releasing a new version." 
and published it to the board's agenda.

Gary

On 2024/11/10 17:09:32 Mukul Gandhi wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>     You wrote,
> 
> <quote>
> Question: has the 3.0 branch been moved to a Maven build yet? I can't speak
> for anyone else, but I would find it somewhat disconcerting if the two code
> streams were using different build engines.
> 
> This is presuming that we do indeed have consensus that we are moving to
> Maven.
> </quote>
> 
> And my following thoughts,
> 
> I'd personally like to put more effort in coming weeks & months to fix few
> more codebase bugs present in Xalan-J's XSL 3 branch, perhaps implement 1-2
> more XSLT 3 instructions, and improve further Xalan-J's XSL 3 tests
> coverage. All of the previous activities I wish to do on Xalan-J's XSL 3
> branch using existing Ant build to help us still focused on XSL 3 languages
> instead on migrating to a different build process.
> 
> Support of more contributors to Xalan-J's XSL 3 codebase shall definitely
> be helpful, to be able to improve Xalan-J's compliance to XSL 3 specs
> further.
> 
> Surely, we can try to migrate to Maven before releasing to users the 1st
> XSL 3 build from Xalan project.
> 
> Regards,
> Mukul
> 
> Mail sent from gmail for Android
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@xalan.apache.org

Reply via email to