Actually, I don't know how much effort we need to do that.. and even worse I don't know if every plugin or dependency used has been already ported.
Greg, if you wanna investigate on this I'll be glad to help you.. just let me know what you need.
Paolo
On 12/23/05, Grégory Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again,
Actually, it seems all would just work better if we had an m2 build of
xd2. Would that be ok for everyone to switch the xdoclet build from m1
to m2? (The plugins and generama can stay on m1)
I'll commit a pom.xml, which can live side by side with the m1 build,
but it seems saner if we had only one build system - and ideally, the
releases should be done with m2 in the future. Just makes it easier
(or even maybe just "possible") to get the m2 plugin running.
Pls tell me what you guys think.
Cheers,
g
On 23/12/05, Grégory Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For some reason, the current deployed versions of xdoclet don't have
> checksum files next to them. That seems to be a reason for maven2 to
> ignore those. I've just tried to deploy an xdoclet-2.0.5-snapshot, in
> order to be able to play around with the coming maven2 plugin; it has
> absolutely no other change than it's pom, in which I also declared the
> xsd, while at it. I'll commit that a bit later if noone objects.
>
> Cheers,
>
> g
>
