--- Grégory Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again, > > Actually, it seems all would just work better if we > had an m2 build of > xd2. Would that be ok for everyone to switch the > xdoclet build from m1 > to m2? (The plugins and generama can stay on m1) > I'll commit a pom.xml, which can live side by side > with the m1 build, > but it seems saner if we had only one build system - > and ideally, the > releases should be done with m2 in the future. Just > makes it easier > (or even maybe just "possible") to get the m2 plugin > running. I think it would be not a problem. AFAIK m1 / m2 builds can coexist peacefully. We can switch to m2 builds for a new releases, and those who like m1 still can build their provate copy And I really need incentive to move to m2 :) regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com
