Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Svante Schubert wrote:
And actually, if we're going to use a Java processor, I suggest it
ought to be Saxon, which is not only an excellent XSLT 1.0
processor, but also adds support for XSLT 2.0.
Was thinking about Saxon as well, but Apache Xerces/Xalan appeared to
be a more 'solid' choice.
"Solid" is what sense? Surely not technically?
Despite its several quite apparent drawbacks, speed and xslt version to
name two, I personally like the Xalan processor because of it's unique
ability to use scripted java extension functions via Rhino.
Matthew L. Avizinis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
