On 06/01/06, Matthew L. Avizinis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Despite its several quite apparent drawbacks, speed and xslt version to > name two, I personally like the Xalan processor because of it's unique > ability to use scripted java extension functions via Rhino. > Matthew L. Avizinis
In the opposite corner; 1. Compliance. Xalan has always been one or two steps behind Saxon. 2. XSLT 2.0 is available has features which are 1.0 extensions. Saxon is available (and compliant now) I can't see a reason to stay with Xalan? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
