Yeah, I'm familiar with Trang, but we have particular Naming and Design rules for Schemas, so we can't just write them in RNG and translate. I am mentioning the ability to translate RNG to XSD as a possibility in the context of this report.
Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: J David Eisenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 23. februar 2006 17:14 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: SV: SV: [xml-dev] OpenXML and Open Document Format for standardization purposes comparison On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Bryan Rasmussen wrote: > I agree with the points about OpenXML's syntax and ODF's, I've had to work > with both, as well as writing two MS Word to XML converters in earlier > projects (straight data extraction), OpenXML is awful. It's not the worst XML > format I've seen, but it's probably in the top ten. > > I'm also in agreement with the point about Schema languages, but that is a > lost case in this office. :( > I've basically resigned myself to XML Schema and Schematron to ease the pain. Have you heard of "trang" from James Clark? http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/trang.html It translates Relax NG to W3C XML Schema. This will probably make your life much easier. > > Cheers, > Bryan Rasmussen > -- J. David Eisenberg http://catcode.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
