Hi Bryan How does that compare with my ODF XForm Ken hosted at http://www.cranesoftwrights.com/resources/index.htm#odf-xslt ?
Also, my XForms for Firefox for most key UBL documents http://www.systml.co.uk/content/view/43/54/ only use a few bindings and seem to work OK. I think you may be pushing the ODF XForms a lot too far - they are a simple provision for simple solutions IMO. So far at least. The filters seem to be more suited to complex requirements. You could even provide a standard mapping of the UBL into a table and export a UBL spreadsheet as HTML then transform it to UBL perhaps. ODF is itself a standard (ISO of course) so you could maybe just combine the UBL with the ODF, specifying a standard mapping of items in the ODF map to UBL, then send the ODF itself as if it were the UBL Order or Invoice. http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200709/msg00037.html It's all standard XML anyway. The same would apply, I guess, to any XML. Just send it as ODF and specify the mapping ?? :-) Regards Steve On 04/10/2007, bryan rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would think that 1000 bindings is too much, by too much I mean that > there would most probably be a noticeable lag between typing text on > the keyboard and its appearance in the input field on the form. IIRC > an order form with ten lines in UBL produced (after all unnecessary > bindings had been dropped) somewhere in the neighborhood of 2000 > bindings and keys entered had a lag time of some seconds per key. So > that with my typing speed entering my name in a field meant I was done > typing and sitting around for what must have been ten seconds while > the field finished getting filled in (I timed it and wrote it down > somewhere but don't want to go look now).This could have been > optimized perhaps, but probably not that much. > > 300 though I think would be reasonable. > > Cheers, > Bryan Rasmussen > > On 10/4/07, Zhang Weiwu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Zhang Weiwu wrote: > > > bryan rasmussen wrote: > > > > > >> As far as repeat, no. I have some examples generating UBL documents > > >> (Invoices) outside of OO with the user determining at generation time > > >> how many lines are required. This however ran into another problem > > >> with the OO implementation which cannot handle the large number of > > >> bindings such a format as UBL requires for the editing of a large > > >> document. > > As of number of binding limitation, how is it? As for the project I am > > working on, we commonly have XForm that have 300 values in it (would > > reflect 300 bindings). > > I would think as an extreme case a form we have may reach 1000 bindings > > in the future. How is your experience in regarding to binding limitation? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Stephen Green Partner SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
