looking over the example you have, that form is basically 1 third the size of the possible information that was wanted in a form with the same number of input fields. And it was wanted that there could be as many input fields as needed, in other words potentially more lines than in the example.
Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen On 10/4/07, Stephen Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Bryan > > How does that compare with my ODF XForm Ken hosted at > http://www.cranesoftwrights.com/resources/index.htm#odf-xslt ? > > Also, my XForms for Firefox for most key UBL documents > http://www.systml.co.uk/content/view/43/54/ only use a few > bindings and seem to work OK. > > I think you may be pushing the ODF XForms a lot too far > - they are a simple provision for simple solutions IMO. So > far at least. > > The filters seem to be more suited to complex requirements. > You could even provide a standard mapping of the UBL into > a table and export a UBL spreadsheet as HTML then transform > it to UBL perhaps. ODF is itself a standard (ISO of course) > so you could maybe just combine the UBL with the ODF, > specifying a standard mapping of items in the ODF map to UBL, > then send the ODF itself as if it were the UBL Order or Invoice. > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200709/msg00037.html > It's all standard XML anyway. The same would apply, I guess, > to any XML. Just send it as ODF and specify the mapping ?? :-) > > Regards > > Steve > > On 04/10/2007, bryan rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would think that 1000 bindings is too much, by too much I mean that > > there would most probably be a noticeable lag between typing text on > > the keyboard and its appearance in the input field on the form. IIRC > > an order form with ten lines in UBL produced (after all unnecessary > > bindings had been dropped) somewhere in the neighborhood of 2000 > > bindings and keys entered had a lag time of some seconds per key. So > > that with my typing speed entering my name in a field meant I was done > > typing and sitting around for what must have been ten seconds while > > the field finished getting filled in (I timed it and wrote it down > > somewhere but don't want to go look now).This could have been > > optimized perhaps, but probably not that much. > > > > 300 though I think would be reasonable. > > > > Cheers, > > Bryan Rasmussen > > > > On 10/4/07, Zhang Weiwu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Zhang Weiwu wrote: > > > > bryan rasmussen wrote: > > > > > > > >> As far as repeat, no. I have some examples generating UBL documents > > > >> (Invoices) outside of OO with the user determining at generation time > > > >> how many lines are required. This however ran into another problem > > > >> with the OO implementation which cannot handle the large number of > > > >> bindings such a format as UBL requires for the editing of a large > > > >> document. > > > As of number of binding limitation, how is it? As for the project I am > > > working on, we commonly have XForm that have 300 values in it (would > > > reflect 300 bindings). > > > I would think as an extreme case a form we have may reach 1000 bindings > > > in the future. How is your experience in regarding to binding limitation? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Stephen Green > > Partner > SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk > Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606 > > http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
