On 9 April 2010 17:14, G. Ken Holman <[email protected]> wrote:
> My understanding is "has to" because the version of Saxon that supports > functions costs money, and I don't see OOo putting in anything that costs > money. +1 Some of the oddities that we thought handy are now 'to be paid for' according to the saxon tax. > But using extensions at any time is risky. +1. We shouldn't have done it in the first place. Sigh Even without the extensions, xslt 2.0 is well worth the switch. Lots of extra functionality that makes complex transformations that much more easy. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
