I just checked in (rev 500554) which will automatically download
saxonb8-8j.zip. Build and checkin tests seem to be working fine.
Don't forget to do an "ant clean.jars" and "ant deploy" to pick up the
new zip.
Cezar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Radu Preotiuc-Pietro
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:10 PM
> To: dev@xmlbeans.apache.org
> Subject: Re: XmlBeans bugs involving comments and processing
instructions
>
> Could you try your test with Saxon 8.8.0.6 if it's not too much
trouble?
> I have run XmlBeans with Saxon 8.8 a couple of months ago and it
worked
> just fine.
>
> Radu
>
> On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 13:57 -0800, cbryant wrote:
> > After further investigation, it appears that the latter (XPath) bug
is
> > actually in the Saxon code
> (net.sf.saxon.dom.NodeWrapper.getStringValueCS()
> > blindly appends the text values of all child nodes, regardless of
type).
> >
> > The good news is that it looks like this bug was fixed somewhere
between
> > 8.6.1 (the version supported by XmlBeans) and 8.8.0.6 (the current
> version).
> > In 8.8.0.6, net.sf.saxon.jdom.NodeWrapper.getStringValueCS()
utilizes
> the
> > org.jdom.Element.getValue() method, which complies with the Xml 1.0
> > specification by concatenating the values of all descendant text
nodes.
> >
> > In the meantime, I guess we'll have to wait until XmlBeans becomes
> > synchronized with a more recent version of Saxon.
> >
> > -Coram
> >
> >
> >
> > cbryant wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > This apparent bug becomes more critical when evaluating XPath
> expressions.
> > > It appears that the same value returned by getTextValue is that
which
> is
> > > passed on to the Saxon XPath engine for evaluating element values,
as
> the
> > > following test shows:
> > >
> > > String xml = "<element><!--A Comment-->999<?PI A Processing
> > > Instruction?></element>";
> > > XmlObject xo = XmlObject.Factory.parse(xml);
> > > xo.selectPath("/element = 3");
> > >
> > > This code snippet causes a Saxon ValidationException, with the
> message:
> > > Cannot convert string " A Comment 999A Processing Ins..." to a
double
> > >
> > >
> > > If these results are a side-effect of misunderstanding, then we
would
> > > greatly appreciate some insight. Otherwise, we're not sure how to
> enter
> > > them as bugs, other than to post on this forum.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Coram
> > >
> > >
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________
> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may
contain
> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and
affiliated
> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted
and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return
this
> by email and then delete it.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
