I think Chaoran covered most of the questions we discussed yesterday. Sunil, are you suggesting to meet next Wed inside of the YK community before setting up a call with sig-scheduling? I noticed the next sig-scheduling meeting is Nov 18, we probably can try to set up sometime earlier than that with a smaller group of people.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 1:02 PM Chaoran Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sunil, > > Next Wednesday at the same time works for me. From what I understand in the > meeting yesterday, we want to initiate a conversation with sig-scheduling > without committing to any actions just yet. > > The information we want to gather from them include the following: > > * What's the overall process and timeline when contributing a plugin? > * Besides contributing code directly in the plugins repo, can the code live > in an outside repo (e.g. Apache repos)? Any other options? > * The scheduler-plugins repo doesn't align with Kubernetes itself in terms > of release cadence nor does it match the latest k8s version. How is it > maintained? > * How does the default scheduler in the core K8s repo incorporate > community-contributed plugins? What's the process of promoting a plugin? > > We can finalize the agenda when we meet next week > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 12:21 PM Sunil Govindan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > > Thanks for joining our weekly sync call. > > > > We have an action item to discuss with the SIG team sooner. Could we > > conclude the meeting agenda earlier within the YuniKorn community itself > > before we have that call? > > We can have one more YuniKorn community call next week to conclude before > > starting the discussion with K8s. I could help schedule this at the same > > time as yesterday (3.00 pm PST) if there are no objections. > > > > Please share your thoughts. > > > > Thanks > > Sunil > > >
