Maybe a more focused discussion with a smaller group of core sig-scheduling folks will be better. We can consider asking them for such a meeting earlier than 11/18, as Weiwei mentioned. That avoids conflict with the meetup too.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 10:46 PM Weiwei Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > I see. > Let's discuss this in the next sync-up call. > Thank you! > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 9:04 PM Chenya Zhang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > btw. We have the YK Meetup on Nov 18th 4:30 - 6:00pm. Hope it will not be > > in conflict with the K8s Sig call. > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 5:33 PM Sunil Govindan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks, Chaoron. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 5:23 PM Chaoran Yu <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Sure, let's use my list as the agenda and finalize next Wednesday > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 3:58 PM Sunil Govindan <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Weiwei > > > > > > > > > > Yes. I suggest meeting next Wed inside of the YK community. > > > > > Based on that we can take a call whether to join on 18th. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Chaoron for summing it up. And we could use that as agenda. > > Is > > > > that > > > > > fine? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Sunil > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 3:21 PM Weiwei Yang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I think Chaoran covered most of the questions we discussed > > yesterday. > > > > > > Sunil, are you suggesting to meet next Wed inside of the YK > > community > > > > > > before setting up a call with sig-scheduling? > > > > > > I noticed the next sig-scheduling meeting is Nov 18, we probably > > can > > > > try > > > > > to > > > > > > set up sometime earlier than that with a smaller group of people. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 1:02 PM Chaoran Yu < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Sunil, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next Wednesday at the same time works for me. From what I > > > understand > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > meeting yesterday, we want to initiate a conversation with > > > > > sig-scheduling > > > > > > > without committing to any actions just yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The information we want to gather from them include the > > following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * What's the overall process and timeline when contributing a > > > plugin? > > > > > > > * Besides contributing code directly in the plugins repo, can > the > > > > code > > > > > > live > > > > > > > in an outside repo (e.g. Apache repos)? Any other options? > > > > > > > * The scheduler-plugins repo doesn't align with Kubernetes > itself > > > in > > > > > > terms > > > > > > > of release cadence nor does it match the latest k8s version. > How > > is > > > > it > > > > > > > maintained? > > > > > > > * How does the default scheduler in the core K8s repo > incorporate > > > > > > > community-contributed plugins? What's the process of promoting > a > > > > > plugin? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We can finalize the agenda when we meet next week > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 12:21 PM Sunil Govindan < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for joining our weekly sync call. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have an action item to discuss with the SIG team sooner. > > Could > > > > we > > > > > > > > conclude the meeting agenda earlier within the YuniKorn > > community > > > > > > itself > > > > > > > > before we have that call? > > > > > > > > We can have one more YuniKorn community call next week to > > > conclude > > > > > > before > > > > > > > > starting the discussion with K8s. I could help schedule this > at > > > the > > > > > > same > > > > > > > > time as yesterday (3.00 pm PST) if there are no objections. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please share your thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
