This will be a great initiative to introduce more structure to how we
handle larger-scale features and improvements.
So far we have been doing things in an ad-hoc way, which tends to get less
effective as the community grows.
+1 from me.

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 4:26 PM Weiwei Yang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oops, got it wrong, you mean broader review, not ASF board.
> Sorry, please ignore my last comment : )
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 4:25 PM Weiwei Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bowen
> >
> > +1
> > Having a formal process will definitely help the cross-org communication.
> > Do we need the ASF board to review this? I am not sure, usually, each
> > project committee is able to decide what is the best for the project.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 4:07 PM Bowen Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'd like to start conversation of building a formal process of YuniKorn
> >> Improvement Proposal (YIP).
> >>
> >> (X)IP is a common approach to propose, discuss, collaborate on and
> tackle
> >> major or important changes in open source projects and communities.
> Within
> >> Apache projects, there're successful examples and adoptions like Spark
> >> (SPIP), Flink (FLIP), Kafka (KIP).
> >>
> >> Similarly, a YIP will define the following parts, including but not
> >> limited
> >> to:
> >> - what's considered a "major change" that needs a YIP
> >> - what should be included in a YIP (e.g. motivation/business
> >> justifications, use case requirements, proposed changes, API changes,
> >> migration/compatibility, rejected alternatives, etc)
> >> - who should initiate or be involved in a YIP
> >> - end-to-end process
> >>
> >> YK community has been growing, and we've seen cases where such a process
> >> can help to better facilitate communications, understanding, and
> >> collaborations within YK community.
> >>
> >> Please share your thoughts, or +1/-1. If we get a consensus this is
> good,
> >> I
> >> will submit a draft for YIP for broader review.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bowen
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to