Should we disable these flaky test now ? CI seems become more unstable
recently. It is almost useless for me, I never see a success CI recently.
Here's one screenshot of recent closed PRs. Most of them has CI failure.
IMO, this is pretty bad, especially for new contributors.



[image: pasted1]





Jun Kim <i2r....@gmail.com>于2016年12月13日周二 下午11:27写道:

> @Hoon Thanks for your information :-) I should use that next time!
>
> 2016년 12월 13일 (화) 오후 8:23, Park Hoon <1am...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>
> > I totally agree with your opinions. I will work on ZEPPELIN-1739,
> > ZEPPELIN-1749 first i reported before.
> >
> > @Jun Kim. So true. We have to wait long time. FYI, we can use our own
> > travis CI containers to test (I recently learned also!) by configuring
> > your-github-id/zeppelin-repo in travis CI
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Jun Kim <i2r....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I definitely agree with you!
> > >
> > > I reopened my PR twice recently to pass CI and it wasn't because of me.
> > >
> > > CI takes about ~40min for a test, so I had to wait 1h and 20min to
> write
> > a
> > > comment after passing CI T_T
> > >
> > > And the worst of it is that I don't believe CI's result more and more.
> > >
> > > 2016년 12월 13일 (화) 오후 8:10, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
> > >
> > > > Hi Folks,
> > > >
> > > > As you may notice that our travis CI is not stable recently. There's
> > many
> > > > flaky test, and it waste every developer's time to figure out whether
> > the
> > > > failure is due to your PR or flaky test. So I think it is time for us
> > to
> > > > make the CI stable. Here's tickets for all the flaky test.
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> > > 3D%20ZEPPELIN%20AND%20text%20~%20flaky%20and%20status%20!%
> > > 3D%20RESOLVED%20ORDER%20%20BY%20status%20ASC%20
> > > >
> > > > Fixing the flaky test may take some time and may not easy for some
> test
> > > but
> > > > I think it is worth to do that.  And it is better for these people
> who
> > > > familiar with that particular test case to fix it. What do you guys
> > > think ?
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Taejun Kim
> > >
> > > Data Mining Lab.
> > > School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
> > > University of Seoul
> > >
> >
> --
> Taejun Kim
>
> Data Mining Lab.
> School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
> University of Seoul
>

Reply via email to