hsteinmueller commented on issue #3480: [ZEPPELIN-3644] SPARQL-Interpreter support via Apache Jena ARQ URL: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3480#issuecomment-549781174 > @hsteinmueller Could you update the pom.xml to resolve the conflict ? done > > > Thanks for the contribution @hsteinmueller , this PR LGTM, could you paste the travis build link ? > > > > > > https://travis-ci.org/hsteinmueller/zeppelin > > > IIUC, `jena` is one implementation of `sparql`. Since interpreter text `%sparql` is user facing, I would prefer to configure the implementation of `sparql` in interpreter setting instead of via interpreter text. > > > > > > Do you want me to update the interpreter settings with this functionality or will this be changed once another implementation gets added? > > I mean to use interpreter setting to choose which implementation. e.g. Add interpreter setting `sparql.type`. IIUC, user don't care about the implementation of sparql ( I may be wrong ), only administrator care about that, so we should put ti in interpreter setting which is often maintained by administrator. I understood what you meant, I just wanted to know if this is needed right now or if we add this setting in the future when another implementation is needed. Nonetheless I tried adding support for different implementations. I hope this works for you ☺️
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services
