Hi, I have curious about this right to the code base, too. What is difference between code from non-CLA contributor and one of our dependency that is Apache2 license? (when "by submitting a patch you agree on Apache2 license" is effective)
Also i think we need to check license of every dependencies we use in java and javascript code. Best, moon > Hi, > as Roman mentioned recently, > > > > > > > *"The biggest next step is to do transition thecode base from GH to our > newly minted Git > repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-zeppelin.git > <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-zeppelin.git>This > will > require an SGA from whoever has therights to the > codebase: https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt > <https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt>"* > Can anybody please help to clarify "whoever has the rights to the > codebase". > Does this only mean a copyright that intrinsically always belongs to a > code/content authors? Or something else? > Does it help if on contributing guide of initial Zeppelin there was a > notice like "by submitting a patch you agree on Apache2 license"? > So am I right, that we need to: > - hunt down every non-CLA contributor in master branch (as only it will be > transferred to ASF repo) > - make them sign and send us SGA > - forward/save those somewhere (where?) > - VOTE on IP clearance > - only then we can actually "git push" to ASF repo > Is that all or am I missing something here? > -- > Kind regards, > Alexander
