Hi Vishal, 900 seems like a biigger change. I think just 880 should be fine, so that folks dont hit the thread blow up issue. BTW, all depends on Ben if he is willing to get 880 in 3.3.3 release. If not we'll have to wait for 3.4 or another release like 3.3.4 (which i personally would like to avoid).
thanks mahadev On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Vishal Kher <vishalm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mahadev, > > I can certainly work on getting 880 in the release. I would like to know if > 900 needs to go in 3.3.3 or not. If I remember correctly, merging patch for > 880 failed when I tired last time because the fix for 900 was not committed > to 3.3.If 900 is not needed, then I can do the fix only for 880. Shouldn't > take that long. Note - without the fix for 900, QCM can block indefinitely. > This can cause serious problems during leader election (especially in a 3 > node setup). Let me know. > > -Vishal > > btw, will there be another release before 3.4.0? We would like to have > patches to > ZOOKEEPER-932<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-932>and > ZOOKEEPER-975 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-975>released > soon as well. > > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Mahadev Konar <maha...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Ben/Vishal, >> Is there any possibility of getting ZOOKEEPER-880 in 3.3.3 release? The >> Hbase guys had been asking for it. >> >> thanks >> mahadev >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@yahoo-inc.com>wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure why you say it is fine, Pat. If I try to compile with the >>> candidate release, ant complains that build-contrib.xml is missing (and it >>> is not where it is supposed to be). Compiling from trunk or one of the >>> branches works fine, though. >>> >>> -Flavio >>> >>> On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >>> >>> I think it's fine - it's in src/contrib not contrib. >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Benjamin Reed <ben.r...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> i don't know why build-contrib.xml is missing. pat do you have any ideas? >>> >>> ant tar should grab it right? >>> >>> >>> ben >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@yahoo-inc.com >>> >wrote: >>> >>> >>> Ben, I have a question. Even though the bookkeeper jar is there, >>> >>> build-contrib.xml is missing (ZOOKEEPER-956), and compiling fails without >>> >>> it. Is it supposed to be this way? >>> >>> >>> -Flavio >>> >>> >>> >>> On Feb 19, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: >>> >>> >>> (the previous email had the URL slightly incorrect) >>> >>> >>> after much struggle! i've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.3. >>> >>> this is a bug fix >>> >>> release addressing 13 issues (two of them extremely critical) -- see the >>> >>> release notes for details. >>> >>> >>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the >>> >>> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, February 22.*** >>> >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~breed/zookeeper-3.3.3-candidate-0/ >>> >>> >>> one thing that has not been fixed in this release is that the docs still >>> >>> reference hadoop. this will be fixed in a future release. >>> >>> >>> should we release this? >>> >>> >>> ben >>> >>> >>> ps - give that this is the first release there is more than likely >>> >>> something >>> >>> i missed and given the severity of issues addressed it would be nice to >>> >>> get >>> >>> it out quickly. please review ASAP. >>> >>> >>> >>> *flavio* >>> >>> *junqueira* >>> >>> >>> research scientist >>> >>> >>> f...@yahoo-inc.com >>> >>> direct +34 93-183-8828 >>> >>> >>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es >>> >>> phone (408) 349 3300 fax (408) 349 3301 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *flavio* >>> *junqueira* >>> >>> research scientist >>> >>> f...@yahoo-inc.com >>> direct +34 93-183-8828 >>> >>> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es >>> phone (408) 349 3300 fax (408) 349 3301 >>> >>> >>> >> >
