To amplify on this, it would be much easier to add committers to the incubator project than to ZK itself.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > > WRT committer status, I don't see how it can work without us being > > committers to Curator. If we're not committers, we'll need to fork it > > internally and I've already gotten a lot of negative feedback on that > > (there are a lot of former Yahoo-ers here). > > What Doug is suggesting is that while you wouldn't be able to commit > yourselves (to start with) one of the existing zk committers would > have to review/commit for you. Granted it's not an optimal situation. > That's why incubator/subproj are better imo.
