[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13923839#comment-13923839
]
Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-716:
---------------------------------------
[~hustlmsp], could you expand on the rationale for this change? In the
description you mention corruption, but this seems more like a perf thing. Do
you have any perf numbers for this change? (also, I would be very interested if
you could share perf numbers from 715 & 717).
> padding writes for bookie journal
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-716
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-716
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-server
> Reporter: Sijie Guo
> Assignee: Sijie Guo
> Fix For: 4.3.0
>
> Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-716.diff, BOOKKEEPER-716_715.diff
>
>
> it would be better to pad journal writes to align sector size, which to avoid
> second syncing corrupt an already synced sector/page.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
