On 20 March 2014 13:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected]> wrote:
> what about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807? > More context: people trying to use Observers in 3.5.0 without that fixed will have issues, for sure. -rgs > > > -rgs > > > On 20 March 2014 13:48, Alexander Shraer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> thanks Patrick! >> >> regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers: >> - add JMX support >> (ZOOKEEPER-1659<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659> >> ) >> - change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no quorum of >> last >> proposed configuration >> (ZOOKEEPER-1699<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699> >> ) >> >> any help with either is greatly appreciated. >> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm >> > assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't >> > hold up releasing a 3.5.0. >> > >> > We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what >> > we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts? >> > >> > A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out >> > what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else >> > has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be >> > helpful. >> > >> > Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!): >> > http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF >> > >> > There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do >> > with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA. >> > >> > There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0: http://bit.ly/PV21NA >> > >> > Patrick >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira < >> [email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > Sure, fine with me. >> > > >> > > -Flavio >> > > >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio? >> > >> >> > >> thanks >> > >> mahadev >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at >> doing >> > >>> a release? >> > >>> >> > >>> Patrick >> > >>> >> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Hopefully today/tomm. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> thanks >> > >>>> mahadev >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM >> for >> > 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> -Flavio >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it >> was >> > >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for >> > monitoring) >> > >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Patrick >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés >> > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >>>>>>> Hi Stefan, >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>> Hi, >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode >> > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery API >> > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what the >> > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion >> > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]). >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is: >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147 >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation >> and an >> > >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates >> when >> > >>>>>>> enabling local sessions. >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Cheers, >> > >>>>>>> -rgs >> > >>>>> >> > > >> > >> > >
