... there is one more. I just canceled it because the patch needs to be rebased.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1794 On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <[email protected]> wrote: > There are several large PAs: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1172 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1346 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1607 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907 > > > I think I can review ZOOKEEPER-1907 and get it in for 3.5.0, but we > need shepherds for the other 3 JIRAs. Let me know if anybody has > cycles to review and check in these patches. Otherwise I'll push them > out of 3.5.0. > > Thanks! > --Michi > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Shraer <[email protected]> wrote: >> right - looks like there's a patch there, waiting for review. >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> On 20 March 2014 13:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > what about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807? >>> > >>> >>> More context: people trying to use Observers in 3.5.0 without that fixed >>> will have issues, for sure. >>> >>> >>> -rgs >>> >>> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > -rgs >>> > >>> > >>> > On 20 March 2014 13:48, Alexander Shraer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> thanks Patrick! >>> >> >>> >> regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers: >>> >> - add JMX support >>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1659<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659> >>> >> ) >>> >> - change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no quorum of >>> >> last >>> >> proposed configuration >>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1699<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699> >>> >> ) >>> >> >>> >> any help with either is greatly appreciated. >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm >>> >> > assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't >>> >> > hold up releasing a 3.5.0. >>> >> > >>> >> > We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what >>> >> > we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts? >>> >> > >>> >> > A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out >>> >> > what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else >>> >> > has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be >>> >> > helpful. >>> >> > >>> >> > Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!): >>> >> > http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF >>> >> > >>> >> > There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do >>> >> > with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA. >>> >> > >>> >> > There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0: >>> http://bit.ly/PV21NA >>> >> > >>> >> > Patrick >>> >> > >>> >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira < >>> >> [email protected]> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > Sure, fine with me. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > -Flavio >>> >> > > >>> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <[email protected] >>> > >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > >>> >> > >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio? >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> thanks >>> >> > >> mahadev >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at >>> >> doing >>> >> > >>> a release? >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> Patrick >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar < >>> >> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk. >>> >> > >>>> >>> >> > >>>> Hopefully today/tomm. >>> >> > >>>> >>> >> > >>>> thanks >>> >> > >>>> mahadev >>> >> > >>>> >>> >> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira < >>> >> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM >>> >> for >>> >> > 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6. >>> >> > >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>> -Flavio >>> >> > >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it >>> >> was >>> >> > >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for >>> >> > monitoring) >>> >> > >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair. >>> >> > >>>>>> >>> >> > >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues. >>> >> > >>>>>> >>> >> > >>>>>> Patrick >>> >> > >>>>>> >>> >> > >>>>>> >>> >> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés >>> >> > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > >>>>>>> Hi Stefan, >>> >> > >>>>>>> >>> >> > >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > >>>>>>>> Hi, >>> >> > >>>>>>>> >>> >> > >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode >>> >> > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery >>> API >>> >> > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what >>> the >>> >> > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion >>> >> > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]). >>> >> > >>>>>>>> >>> >> > >>>>>>> >>> >> > >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is: >>> >> > >>>>>>> >>> >> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147 >>> >> > >>>>>>> >>> >> > >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation >>> >> and an >>> >> > >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates >>> >> when >>> >> > >>>>>>> enabling local sessions. >>> >> > >>>>>>> >>> >> > >>>>>>> Cheers, >>> >> > >>>>>>> -rgs >>> >> > >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>>
