[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14357370#comment-14357370
]
Alexander Shraer commented on ZOOKEEPER-2136:
---------------------------------------------
Agreed, quorum sync seems better. In any case, a quorum read can be implemented
using quorum sync later, there doesn't seem much difference between the two.
[~hdeng], looks like all pendingSyncs stuff should be removed.
> Sync() should get quorum acks.
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2136
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2136
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Hongchao Deng
> Assignee: Hongchao Deng
> Fix For: 3.6.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2000.patch
>
>
> Currently if the sync packet goes to leader it doesn't get quorum acks. This
> is a problem during reconfig and leader changes. testPortChange() flaky
> failure is caused by such case.
> I proposed to change sync() semantics to require quorum acks in any case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
