Ping me (directly at my email or via Jira tagging pls) if you have
something I could help with this weekend. Otherwise I'll poke around and
see if there's a bit I can do.

C

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Wait until we have 2125 in, pls.
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 13 Mar 2015, at 23:30, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks, any thoughts on when we should cut a release?
> >
> > Note: Michi expressed interest in being the release manager for this
> > release, so I've handed over the token to him. I will be mentoring him
> > through the process, so I'll still be around.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Rakesh R <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Thank you Flavio for helping us. I will wait to see your feedback.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Rakesh
> >> ________________________________
> >> 本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁
> >> 止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发)本邮件中
> >> 的信息。如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件!
> >> This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
> HUAWEI, which
> >> is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
> above. Any use of the
> >> information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to,
> total or partial
> >> disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the
> intended
> >> recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> notify the sender by
> >> phone or email immediately and delete it!
> >> From: Flavio Junqueira [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: 12 March 2015 02:09
> >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Rakesh R
> >> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
> >>
> >> We should be able to have it in before the end of this week. I'm
> currently reviewing it.
> >>
> >> -Flavio
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:03 PM, Hongchao Deng <
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think we can cut 3.5.1 for ZOOKEEPER-2125 regarding SSL. The auth
> would take too much time.Folks, please help push ZOOKEEPER-2125 and move
> this forward :)
> >>
> >> - Hongchao Deng
> >>
> >>> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> >>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> >>> Subject: RE: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
> >>> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:54:01 +0000
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> Hongchao/Rakesh, do you think the SSL patch should go in to 3.5.1?
> >>> Thanks Michi for pointing this. Right now we have agreed upon
> ZOOKEEPER-2125. Major work will be finished with this jira, will push this
> in if nobody complains/comments. Still there are few more sub-tasks to be
> completed. Will try best and see the progress in this week. I feel based on
> that will take a decision. Is that ok?
> >>>
> >>> -Rakesh
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Michi
> Mutsuzaki
> >>> Sent: 10 March 2015 12:10
> >>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> >>> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release?
> >>>
> >>> It would be great if somebody can review ZOOKEEPER-1506.
> >>> Hongchao/Rakesh, do you think the SSL patch should go in to 3.5.1?
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>> Hi folks, just checking in. Any reason we shouldn't do a release in
> >>>> the near future? Anything pending that absolutely needs to get in?
> >>>>
> >>>> Patrick
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>> Sounds reasonable. Let's try to get these in, but depending on how
> >>>>> much progress we make we might need to cut off at some point an push
> >>>>> a release. They can always catch the next train.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'll try to update the jira list over the weekend, clean them up and
> >>>>> see where we are.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>>> I'd like to get ZOOKEEPER-1506 in.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> I'd like to see the SSL work in for the next release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Flavio
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 05 Feb 2015, at 19:34, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It would be nice, but they are not blockers, to get these in:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1998
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2051
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2098
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> thanks Patrick!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -rgs
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 5 February 2015 at 11:22, Michi Mutsuzaki <
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1 I can check in ZOOKEEPER-1366 tonight.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan
> >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> +1 for 3.5.1-alpha release
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I think its good to include the following jira issues:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>   ZOOKEEPER-1366 (so far we got two +1)
> >>>>>>>>>>   ZOOKEEPER-1907 (its not blocking, good to have imprv)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>> Rakesh
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks. 3.5.0-alpha has been out for a bit now, we've gotten
> >>>>>>>>>>> some good feedback and a number of jira issues have been
> >>>>>>>>>>> resolved. What do you think about putting out an updated
> >>>>>>>>>>> 3.5.1-alpha release with the latest changes? Anything blocking
> >>>>>>>>>>> us or that you feel important to include?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to